Feminist Theory.
Gender motions get cooked when one side treats "feminism" as a single position. It's four overlapping traditions with real internal disagreements. Knowing which one you're standing on is the difference between a real case and a slogan.
01Core concepts
First-wave feminism
Roughly 1840s-1920s. The legal-rights wave: suffrage, property ownership, the right to divorce, the right to sit on a jury. Resolved most of its targets in rich democracies by mid-century.
Second-wave feminism
1960s-1980s. Moved past formal-legal equality to "the personal is political": workplace equality, reproductive rights, sexual harassment law, domestic-violence policy. This is the wave that shaped most current Western family law.
Third-wave feminism
1990s onward. Pluralism over universalism: pushed back on the assumption that "women" was a single political category and that white middle-class concerns spoke for everyone. Where the intersectional turn lives.
Intersectionality
The idea that gender oppression compounds with race, class, sexuality, and disability in ways you can't just add up. A Black woman doesn't face "racism plus sexism"; she faces a distinct experience the additive frame misses. Coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989.
Liberal vs radical vs Marxist feminism
Liberal: integrate women into existing institutions, fix the rules so they're neutral. Radical: the institutions themselves are gendered; integration isn't enough. Marxist: gender oppression is downstream of class oppression, and you can't fix one without the other. Most contemporary policy debate sits in tension between the first two.
Care economy
Unpaid domestic and caregiving work, disproportionately done by women, valued at roughly 10-39% of GDP depending on country and method. Most feminist economic arguments anchor here: the economy externalizes care onto unpaid labor.
Glass ceiling vs sticky floor
Glass ceiling: the barrier women hit moving into elite roles. Sticky floor: the cluster of low-wage feminized industries (care work, retail, hospitality) where most working women actually are. Policy that breaks the ceiling often doesn't touch the floor.
Choice feminism (and the critique)
The idea that any choice a woman makes is feminist because she made it. The standard critique: choices are made inside structures, so "I chose to leave my career" is still shaped by the absence of childcare, paid leave, and male partners doing equal housework.
02How this shows up in debates
Workplace-policy motions
"THW mandate that public companies have boards at least 40% women." Pick your lane: liberal-feminist case (equal access to elite positions matters intrinsically and corrects bias-driven misallocation) vs critique (helps a small elite while leaving the sticky floor untouched).
Family-policy motions
"THW require an equal split of parental leave between parents." Case turns on whether you think the care economy is a women's problem (let women decide) or a structural problem (the rules incentivize unequal splits, change the rules).
Representation motions
"THBT feminism, as currently practiced in the West, has failed working-class women." Intersectional case: the movement's wins concentrate in professional-managerial occupations; minimum-wage care workers got little of it.
Identity / definition motions
"THBT trans women are women." This is a metaphysical and political claim simultaneously; the strongest cases on both sides cite different feminist traditions on what "woman" categorizes.
03What people get wrong
"All feminists agree about [X]."
Liberal feminists, radical feminists, intersectional feminists, and ecofeminists disagree on most current policy questions. Naming which strand you're defending is more persuasive than waving "feminism" as a bloc.
"Feminism is about hating men."
No serious feminist tradition argues this. The closest is some second-wave radical feminism arguing that patriarchy as a system harms men too (limits emotional range, channels them into violence and risk).
"The gender pay gap is just women choosing lower-paid careers."
About 60% of the raw gap is explained by occupation, hours, and experience. The remaining 40% (the "adjusted" gap, ~6-10 percentage points in most rich countries) is what economists can't explain with anything but discrimination or career disruption from caregiving.
04Self-check quiz
Five questions to check what stuck. Click an option, the right answer and the why appear below. Your best score saves locally so you can come back and beat it.
05Sample motions
THBT feminist movements should prioritize the care economy over corporate-boardroom representation.
Argue →
THW criminalize the purchase, but not the sale, of sex (Nordic model).
Argue →
THBT the gender pay gap is primarily a problem of unpaid care work, not workplace discrimination.
Argue →
THW require all custody disputes to begin with a default 50-50 split.
Argue →
THBT intersectional feminism has, on net, weakened the political coalition for women's rights.
Argue →
06Where to go deeper
Invisible Women
by Caroline Criado Perez
How everything from drug dosing to seatbelt design to office temperatures defaults to male physiology. Hardest-hitting fact-bank for "structural sexism" arguments in print.
Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People About Race
by Reni Eddo-Lodge
Best short read on intersectionality if you want to see why race and gender don't add up linearly.
The Second Sex
by Simone de Beauvoir
The book second-wave feminism is built on top of. Long; read the introduction and the chapter "Woman: Myth and Reality" if nothing else.
Argue a motion on Feminist Theory.
Pick a side. The AI takes the other. Three minutes per speech, judge ballot at the end.
Argue this →